斗鱼

‘They’ve Bankrupted Themselves’: Europe Gutted Own Security to Funnel Kiev Weapons, Expert Says_我的网站

A |     Scott Ritter, a military analyst and former US Marine Corps intelligence officer, told Sputnik on Thursday that NATO’s policy of giving Ukraine billions of dollars in weapons that so quickly get destroyed is “inefficient and counterproductive” from both a political and a national security point of view.,“The more Europe invests its military capacity into Ukraine, the weaker Europe gets,” Ritter said.,Proxy Wars Are Expensive,“I think there's a couple of things at play here. One, and I think first and foremost, is that Europe has bankrupted its own military capacity by transferring military equipment to Ukraine in an unconstrained manner. It's becoming clear to all that Ukraine is facing a very difficult time on the battlefield. Weaponry is being provided by Europe, by the United States, by NATO, and this weaponry is not being absorbed in a coherent manner by the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Instead, it's being received and rushed to the front where it is not being used effectively and increasingly it's being destroyed by the Russians. This is very expensive, very inefficient. It's detrimental not only to Ukraine's military capability but also the nations providing the equipment. They're literally stripping bare their own inventories to support Ukraine in a losing cause,” Ritter explained.,“The second part of this equation is, not only is this inefficient and counterproductive from a national security standpoint, but it's expensive and counterproductive from a political standpoint,” he said. “I think the political cost of supporting Ukraine is about to become very, very high.”,“Many political leaders in Europe now are going to be facing an increasingly hostile constituency, demanding answers as to why their leaders committed: a) economic suicide by joining in on a failed sanctions effort; b) are further bankrupting the nation by stripping bare their own arsenals, requiring them to expend money to restock. This is an expensive proposition. And c), supporting what is increasingly being documented as a very corrupt and, frankly speaking, vile regime in Kiev.”,Kiev’s Mask is Slipping,Ritter noted how Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky “is no longer seen as the savior” by Westerners. “More and more, he's being seen as what he has always been, an incompetent politician operating way above his capabilities.”,In particular, he recalled how a damning CBS documentary about the conflict was partially retracted earlier this month after it revealed that some 70% of equipment given to Ukraine never reaches the battlefield, either because the Russians destroy them or because they’re sold off on the black market. Forthcoming trials in Mariupol can also be expected to further peel back the Western myths about the Azov Regiment and other neo-Nazi units being anything but fascists.,© AP Photo / Alexander ZemlianichenkoRussian soldiers walk inside the Ukraine's Azov Regiment base adorned with the unit's emblems in Yuriivka resort settlement on the coast of Azov Sea not far from Mariupol, in territory under the government of the Donetsk People's Republic, eastern Ukraine, Wednesday, May 18, 2022Russian soldiers walk inside the Ukraine's Azov Regiment base adorned with the unit's emblems in Yuriivka resort settlement on the coast of Azov Sea not far from Mariupol, in territory under the government of the Donetsk People's Republic, eastern Ukraine, Wednesday, May 18, 2022© AP Photo / Alexander Zemlianichenko,“It's a horribly corrupt regime. It's also a regime that is being linked to an odious ideology, the old ideology of Stepan Bandera - a neo-Nazi, right wing, ultra-nationalistic ideology responsible for the murders of hundreds of thousands of people in the years of World War II and the decade afterwards, people who terrorized, murdered, raped ethnic Russians in the aftermath of the Maidan coup that took place in 2014,” Ritter noted.,“I think you're seeing Europeans starting to recoil from this and saying ‘This is not what we want to be seen as supporting.’ All of this, when you bring it together, explains why people aren't willing to continue to dispatch military equipment to Ukraine.”,Ritter dismissed the idea that Berlin and Paris could continue to send weapons to Kiev at the same pace that they have been. In this area, too, they will soon be eclipsed by Washington.,“Military equipment is not produced with the snap of a finger. And it requires a budgetary process. It requires careful coordination with the industrial base, and equipment is procured over the course of several years. What Europe has done by providing this equipment to Ukraine is in one fell swoop, in a matter of months, they've taken decades of military procurement and transferred it to Ukraine with no plan on how to replace it. You can't just simply pick up the phone and say, ‘give me a hundred more tanks,’ ‘give me a hundred more artillery pieces.’ It doesn't work that way. They have literally destroyed the very fabric of their national security by stripping bare their coverage with no means of replacing this. They've already bankrupted themselves. There's really not that much left they can give to Ukraine,” he explained.,‘This Can Only Be Resolved Politically’,Ritter said EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell is “out of his competency level” in commenting on military affairs, especially in making claims like “This war will be won on the battlefield.”,“You weren't going to see a general talking about that in that way,” he noted. “Fact is, most military people said that this can only be resolved politically, this being the conflict in Ukraine. Borrell is way off base. He's out of his competency level and he's just playing wrong. Who's going to solve this on the battlefield? What military in Europe today is capable of standing toe to toe with the Russian military in Ukraine and beating them? And the answer is none. There's nobody that can do this.”,Ritter said Germany and France, the two powerhouse NATO nations in continental Europe, are “paying a horrific economic price” and political price for their efforts to bring the US back firmly into the NATO fold, following four years of vacillation by former US President Donald Trump.,© AP Photo / BelTA, Andrei StasevichNormandy format talksNormandy format talks© AP Photo / BelTA, Andrei Stasevich,“[N]ow the United States has committed to NATO and has committed NATO to this horrendous mistake: that is the expansion into Ukraine, the confrontation with Russia, and this very expensive proxy war against Russia in Ukraine, that NATO is losing and losing decisively,” Ritter said. “But there's a lot of politics at play here. And it's not as a matter of just simply snapping your fingers and saying, ‘Okay, we've made a mistake, we're done, we're going to now reexamine a new European security framework.’”,Ritter recalled Berlin and Paris were also key guarantors of the Minsk Accords, which were supposed to settle the Donbass conflict in the context of autonomy for the Russian-speaking regions.,“It's not only that they failed to pressure Ukraine. It appears, according to [Petro] Poroshenko, the former president of Ukraine, that they were complicit in a scheme that used the Minsk Accords as a sham method to extend the negotiations, knowing they would never be finalized, to buy time so that NATO could train Ukrainian Armed Forces so that they would be in a position to be able to retake all of the Donbass and perhaps Crimea,” Ritter noted.,“Germany and France were part and parcel of this effort, so they need to be careful. They're very exposed here in terms of the politics of that. But reality is reality. And the reality is that the current European security framework, dominated as it is by American national security interests, is unsustainable for Europe,” he said. “They are paying a horrific economic price and they will probably pay a political price. Some of these leaders that are in power today won't be in power in the coming months as their citizens rise up through the democratic process and remove them for incompetence and for pursuing bad policies.”,“The last problem is Russia sort of owns the notion of European security framework having defined it, and their needs and their requirements in December of last year, through two draft treaties shared with NATO and the United States. For Germany and France to pursue a new European security framework would mean that they are stepping away from the United States and stepping toward Russia. That's very politically difficult to do, no matter how justified it might be.”,© Sputnik / Sergei AverinEight years of conflict have left a mark: it will take decades to demine the territory of the republics. Photo: A warning sign at a position near the line of contact with Ukrainian forces near Spartak village in the Donetsk region.     Eight years of conflict have left a mark: it will take decades to demine the territory of the republics. Photo: A warning sign at a position near the line of contact with Ukrainian forces near Spartak village in the Donetsk region.     © Sputnik / Sergei Averin,‘Somebody Else is Going to Have to Seek Peace for Them’,Ritter said that, like World War II after the Battle of Kursk, everyone knows that Ukraine has lost. The question is whether or not the government in Kiev is capable of making peace; he predicts not.,“It's going to be a victory in accordance with all of the prerequisites accomplished - demilitarization, de-Nazification and NATO removed from Ukraine. Russia has also now appeared to put some territorial requirements,” Ritter said.,“The key question is, how does this end at some point?” he asked. “There's going to be a need for a political collapse in Kiev, where the current cadre of warmongers and nationalists have to be removed. They will not seek peace. Somebody else is going to have to seek peace for them.”,“I think it's becoming clear that the current regime in Ukraine cannot be entrusted to govern in a responsible fashion, and I think Russia's taken it as part of their policy that they will protect ethnic Russians going forward, which means that they will probably acquire additional territory in Ukraine where ethnic Russians live. This takes time. It's not going to happen overnight. As much as Russia is winning the war, there's still a very strong Ukrainian military on the field that's receiving military assistance from the United States and NATO. So there's a lot of work left to be done.”。    

　    一键部署OpenClaw        从SEO到GEO：企业网站内容优化需要补齐哪些基础工作    过去，企业网站开展搜索优化时，主要关注关键词、页面标题、网站结构、内容更新和外部链接。    这些工作仍然重要，但随着用户获取信息的方式发生变化，企业网站还需要考虑一个新问题：网站内容能不能被搜索工具准确理解。    这也是SEO与GEO需要结合规划的原因。    SEO主要解决网页能不能被搜索引擎发现、抓取和展示；GEO更关注企业信息能不能被智能搜索工具理解、整理和引用。    企业不需要放弃原有的SEO工作，而是需要在SEO基础上，把网站内容整理得更加清楚、完整和可信。    一、先检查网站基础结构    开展内容优化之前，需要先检查网站能不能正常访问。    常见检查项目包括：    页面能不能正常打开；手机端显示是否完整；导航栏目是否清楚；重要页面有没有失效；页面标题和描述是否重复；网站内容能不能被正常抓取。

B |     如果网站本身存在大量打不开的页面、重复内容和混乱链接，即使持续发布文章，也很难形成稳定的搜索表现。    因此，SEO和GEO都需要从网站基础结构开始。    二、企业介绍要写清楚具体业务    不少企业网站的介绍页面使用了大量宣传用语，例如“专业服务”“品质保障”“值得信赖”。    这些词语看起来比较正式，但能够提供的实际信息有限。

C |     企业介绍页面更适合回答下面几个问题：    企业主要提供什么产品或服务；服务对象主要有哪些；能够解决哪些具体问题；服务范围包含哪些内容；项目通常怎样推进。    内容越具体，用户越容易理解，搜索工具也更容易判断页面主题。    三、服务页面不要只放简单介绍    部分企业网站的服务页面只有一张图片、一段简介和一个咨询按钮。    这种页面虽然制作简单，但能够提供的信息较少。    一个相对完整的服务页面，可以包含：    服务内容    说明该项服务主要包含哪些工作。

D |     适用场景    介绍哪些企业或哪些情况下可能需要这项服务。    实施流程    展示需求整理、方案确认、设计开发、测试和交付等步骤。    交付范围    说明项目完成后可以获得哪些页面、功能或资料。    常见问题    整理用户在选择服务前经常提出的问题。    这些信息既能帮助用户判断，也能提高页面内容的完整度。    四、文章要围绕真实问题展开    企业网站更新文章时，不建议只围绕关键词重复编写相似内容。    更合适的做法，是从用户经常提出的问题出发，例如：    企业网站改版前需要准备什么；网站长期没有收录应该检查什么；SEO和GEO之间有什么区别；企业怎样整理适合AI搜索理解的内容；服务页面应该包含哪些信息；网站内容为什么不能大量重复。    每篇文章集中解决一个问题，标题、正文和结论保持一致。

E |     这样不仅方便用户阅读，也能减少网站内部大量相似文章的问题。    五、统一不同平台上的企业信息    企业可能同时在网站、自媒体、行业平台和企业资料页面中发布信息。    如果不同平台上的企业名称、业务范围和服务介绍差别过大，用户会难以判断哪一份信息准确。    因此，企业需要统一以下基础内容：    企业名称；主要业务；服务对象；服务区域；产品或服务名称；核心介绍。

F |     统一并不代表所有平台都使用完全相同的文章，而是基础事实不要互相冲突。

G |     六、增加可以核实的内容    企业网站不能只有宣传口号，还需要提供可以帮助用户判断的具体信息。    例如：    服务流程；功能说明；页面结构；项目准备清单；常见问题；交付内容；后期维护范围。    发布案例时，还需要保证案例真实，不要虚构客户名称、项目数据和优化结果。

H |     具体、真实的内容，比大量夸张描述更有参考价值。    七、SEO与GEO需要长期维护    SEO和GEO都不是发布几篇文章就能完成的工作。    企业网站需要定期检查：    旧内容有没有过时；服务内容有没有变化；页面链接有没有失效；企业介绍是否准确；用户又提出了哪些新问题；网站是否出现重复页面。

I |     可以按照每月或每季度的频率，对网站内容进行整理。    发现信息过时后及时修改，比不断增加低质量页面更加有效。    结语    SEO和GEO并不是两个互相替代的方向。

J |     SEO帮助网站建立正常的搜索基础，GEO则进一步要求企业把信息表达得更加清楚、完整和容易理解。    企业可以先检查网站结构，再完善企业介绍和服务页面，然后围绕用户问题持续更新内容。    当网站信息真实、结构清楚、内容具体时，不仅有利于传统搜索，也更符合新的信息获取方式。    (作者：梓彤超越科技)

申请创业报道，分享创业好点子。点击此处，共同探讨创业新机遇！。

K |

Current article:http://xbgdytf.foucaorengtunzhuaikuowang.cyou/news/20260826_9046.html

Published on:10:06:22